{"id":197,"date":"2007-10-04T16:20:01","date_gmt":"2007-10-04T16:20:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.phwi.org\/blog\/?p=197"},"modified":"2020-07-10T19:36:55","modified_gmt":"2020-07-10T19:36:55","slug":"board-of-architectural-review-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.phwi.org\/blog\/?p=197","title":{"rendered":"Board of Architectural Review"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><\/strong>The Rose Foundation appeared  before the BAR concerning the fate of several houses in the 400 block  of South Kent Street. The demolition requests for 404, 406, 412 1\/2 &#8211;  414 were denied with a vote of 3-2, while 418 was denied unanimously.  The demolition request of 408 S. Kent was approved unanimously. The BAR  members opposing the demolitions cited the irreparable damage to the  historic fabric and character of the Kent Street corridor with the loss  of an entire block was the main concern and troublesome precedent.  Others cited that other preservation options never seriously considered  for these properties, and a true test on the market to search for  purchasers willing and able to renovate the structures could provide  that test.<\/p>\n<p>The fight may not yet be over to save the 400 block of South Kent  Street. An appeal to City Council by the Rose Foundation is likely.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Rose Foundation appeared before the BAR concerning the fate of several houses in the 400 block of South Kent Street. The demolition requests for 404, 406, 412 1\/2 &#8211; 414 were denied with a vote of 3-2, while 418 was denied unanimously. The demolition request of 408 S. Kent was approved unanimously. The BAR &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.phwi.org\/blog\/?p=197\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Board of Architectural Review<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5377,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[8],"class_list":["post-197","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-board-of-architectural-review","tag-bar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.phwi.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.phwi.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.phwi.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.phwi.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.phwi.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=197"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.phwi.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5378,"href":"https:\/\/www.phwi.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197\/revisions\/5378"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.phwi.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/5377"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.phwi.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=197"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.phwi.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=197"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.phwi.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=197"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}